In a single teaser, the anchor requested the actress if her pre-trial assertion that she “nonetheless (has) love for” Depp stands, regardless of having doubled down on her testimony that he viciously abused her throughout their marriage and claiming that he made good on a promise to globally humiliate her.
“Sure, completely,” Heard responded.
“I like him. I cherished him with all my coronary heart and I attempted one of the best I might to make a damaged relationship work and I couldn’t.
“I’ve no unhealthy emotions or sick will in direction of him in any respect.
“I do know that is perhaps hard to know or it is perhaps very easy to know when you’ve ever cherished anybody.”
“To my dying day, I’ll stand by each word in my testimony,” Heard continued.
Nonetheless, she conceded, “I did do and say horrible, regrettable things all through my relationship.
“I behaved in horrible, nearly unrecognisable to myself, methods.
“I’ve a lot remorse,” she stated, blaming it on “being pushed to the extent the place I didn’t even know the distinction between … proper and incorrect.”
Heard: Jury fell for a ‘incredible actor’
“I’m not a great sufferer, I get it,” she stated.
“I’m not a likeable sufferer, I’m not an ideal sufferer.”
The jury discovered that Heard defamed Depp in a 2018 Washington Publish article – wherein she described herself as “a public determine representing home abuse” – that they agreed was false, defamatory and with malice, on all counts, and awarded him US$15 million damages, comprised of $10m compensatory and an extra $5m punitive.
Heard instructed Guthrie that she doesn’t blame the jury for not believing her testimony.
“I really perceive,” she stated.
“He’s a beloved character and folks really feel they know him. He’s a incredible actor.
“I’ll put it this fashion, how might they make a judgment, how might they not come to that conclusion.
“Once more, how might they after listening to three-and-a-half weeks of testimony about how I used to be an uncredible particular person and to not consider a word that got here out of my mouth.”
Heard received one in every of her three defamation counterclaims towards Depp and was awarded $2 million in damages. The jury discovered that Depp’s lawyer Adam Waldman defamed her when he instructed the Every day Mail she arrange Depp in a hoax when the police got here to their condominium in Could 2016.
The star stated she “wouldn’t blame the common particular person for taking a look at this and the way it’s been lined and never assume that it’s Hollywood brats at their worst”.
“We have been terrible to one another. I made numerous errors — numerous errors,” she continued.
“However I’ve at all times instructed the reality.”
Talking to Guthrie – who final week revealed her husband had performed consulting work with Depp’s authorized team – Heard additionally commented on the extreme scrutiny of her six-week trial and the overwhelming help for Depp on social media. The hashtag “Justice for Amber Heard” garnered 27 million views on TikTok, in contrast with one for Depp which hit 20 billion views.
“I don’t care what one thinks about me or what judgments you need to make about what occurred within the privateness of my very own home, in my marriage, behind closed doorways,” Heard instructed Guthrie.
“I don’t presume the common particular person ought to know these things. And so I don’t take it personally. However even any individual who is bound I’m deserving of all this hate and vitriol, even when you assume that I’m mendacity, you continue to couldn’t look me within the eye and inform me that you simply assume on social media there’s been a good illustration.
“You can not inform me that you simply assume that this has been honest.”
“I’ve by no means felt extra faraway from my very own humanity. I felt lower than human,” she stated.
“Each single day, I handed for 3, 4 generally six metropolis blocks lined with folks holding indicators saying, ‘Burn the witch,’ ‘Loss of life to Amber,’” she stated.
“After three-and-a-half weeks I took the stand and noticed a courtroom packed filled with Captain Jack Sparrow followers who’re vocal, energised,” she stated, referring to Depp’s “Pirates of the Carribean” character.
The unique interview was secretly filmed in New York Metropolis on June 9, Deadline reviews. To maintain the particular away from prying eyes, the interview was not filmed at NBC’s iconic 30 Rock constructing.
A spokesperson for Heard beforehand instructed information.com.au in regards to the interview: “Johnny Depp’s authorized team blanketed the media for days after the decision with quite a few statements and interviews on tv, and Depp himself did the identical on social media.”
“Ms Heard merely meant to answer what they aggressively did final week; she did so by expressing her ideas and emotions, a lot of which she was not allowed to do on the witness stand,” the spokesperson continued in a press release.
‘Crocodile tears’: Juror calls out Heard
Earlier this week, a juror within the defamation case revealed the jury was “very uncomfortable” with Heard’s testimony as a result of there was a scarcity of proof to help it and he or she appeared to cry “crocodile tears”.
One of many jurors from the seven-person panel, who spoke on the situation of anonymity, instructed ABC Information solely that “numerous Amber’s story didn’t add up” and “the vast majority of the jury felt she was extra the aggressor”.
“The crying, the facial expressions, the staring on the jury, all of us have been very uncomfortable,” the male juror stated.
“She would reply one query and he or she can be crying and two seconds later she would flip ice chilly … a few of us used the expression ‘crocodile tears.’”
Depp, in the meantime, saved his composure and was extra plausible, in response to the juror.
The juror added that he felt each side have been “abusive to one another,” however doesn’t consider that “that makes both of them proper or incorrect.”
“However to rise to the extent of what she was claiming, there wasn’t sufficient or any proof that basically supported what she was saying,” he stated.
The most important blow to Heard’s credibility within the eyes of the jury was the “fiasco” revelation she hadn’t donated US$7 million from her divorce settlement to charity as she instructed a UK speak present she had, the juror continued.
Heard instructed the trial that she “pledged the whole lot” to the charity, regardless of earlier claiming it had already been donated.
“The video exhibits her sitting there telling the host she gave all that cash away. And the phrases she utilized in that video clip have been ‘I gave it away,’ ‘I donated it,’ ‘it’s gone.’ However the truth is, she didn’t give a lot of it away in any respect,” the juror stated.
“The very fact is, she didn’t give a lot of it away in any respect.”
“I’m actually humbled,” he continued.
“Six years in the past, my life, the lifetime of my kids, the lives of these closest to me, and likewise, the lives of the individuals who for a lot of, a few years have supported and believed in me have been endlessly modified.
“False, very severe and felony allegations have been levied at me by way of the media, which triggered an countless barrage of hateful content material, though no expenses have been ever introduced towards me.
“It had already travelled world wide twice inside a nanosecond and it had a seismic affect on my life and my profession.”
Heard additionally issued a press release on the time, saying she was upset “past phrases”.
“I’m much more upset with what this verdict means for different girls. It’s a setback. It units again the clock to a time when a girl who spoke up and spoke out may very well be publicly shamed and humiliated. It units again the concept violence towards girls is to be taken significantly.
“I’m unhappy I misplaced this case. However I’m sadder nonetheless that I appear to have misplaced a proper I believed I had as an American – to talk freely and overtly.”